Identification and estimation of mediational effects of longitudinal modified treatment policies (preprint)

We demonstrate a comprehensive semiparametric approach to causal mediation analysis, addressing the complexities inherent in settings with longitudinal and continuous treatments, confounders, and mediators. Our methodology utilizes a nonparametric structural equation model and a cross-fitted sequential regression technique based on doubly robust pseudo-outcomes, yielding an efficient, asymptotically normal estimator without relying on restrictive parametric modeling assumptions. We are motivated by a recent scientific controversy regarding the effects of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) on the survival of COVID-19 patients, considering acute kidney injury (AKI) as a mediating factor. We highlight the possibility of "inconsistent mediation," in which the direct and indirect effects of the exposure operate in opposite directions. We discuss the significance of mediation analysis for scientific understanding and its potential utility in treatment decisions.

Introducing longitudinal modified treatment policies: a unified framework for studying complex exposures (preprint)

This tutorial discusses a recently developed methodology for causal inference based on longitudinal modified treatment policies (LMTPs). LMTPs generalize many commonly used parameters for causal inference including average treatment effects, and facilitate the mathematical formalization, identification, and estimation of many novel parameters. LMTPs apply to a wide variety of exposures, including binary, multivariate, and continuous, as well as interventions that result in violations of the positivity assumption. LMTPs can accommodate time-varying treatments and confounders, competing risks, loss-to-follow-up, as well as survival, binary, or continuous outcomes. This tutorial aims to illustrate several practical uses of the LMTP framework, including describing different estimation strategies and their corresponding advantages and disadvantages. We provide numerous examples of types of research questions which can be answered within the proposed framework. We go into more depth with one of these examples -- specifically, estimating the effect of delaying intubation on critically ill COVID-19 patients' mortality. We demonstrate the use of the open source R package lmtp to estimate the effects, and we provide code on https://github.com/kathoffman/lmtp-tutorial.

Corticosteroids in COVID-19: Optimizing Observational Research through Target Trial Emulations (preprint)

Background: Observational research provides a unique opportunity to learn causal effects when randomized trials are not available, but obtaining the correct estimates hinges on a multitude of design and analysis choices. We illustrate the advantages of modern causal inference methods and compare to standard research practice to estimate the effect of corticosteroids on mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in an observational dataset. We use several large RCTs to benchmark our results. Methods: Our retrospective data source consists of 3,293 COVID-19 patients hospitalized at New York Presbyterian March 1-May 15, 2020. We design our study using the Target Trial Emulation framework. We estimate the effect of an intervention consisting of 6 days of corticosteroids administered at the time of severe hypoxia and contrast with an intervention consisting of no corticosteroids administration. The dataset includes dozens of time-varying confounders. We estimate the causal effects using a doubly robust estimator where the probabilities of treatment, outcome, and censoring are estimated using flexible regressions via super learning. We compare these analyses to standard practice in clinical research, consisting of two main methods: (i) Cox models for an exposure of corticosteroids receipt within various time windows of hypoxia, and (ii) a Cox time-varying model where the exposure is daily administration of corticosteroids starting at the time of hospitalization. Results: The effect in our target trial emulation is qualitatively identical to an RCT benchmark, estimated to reduce 28-day mortality from 32% (95% confidence interval: 31-34) to 23% (21-24). The estimated effect from meta-analyses of RCTs for corticosteroids is an odds ratio of 0.66 (0.53-0.82)(1). Hazard ratios from the Cox models range in size and direction from 0.50 (0.41-0.62) to 1.08 (0.80-1.47) and all study designs suffer from various forms of bias. Conclusion: We demonstrate in a case study that clinical research based on observational data can unveil true causal relations. However, the correctness of these effect estimates requires designing and analyzing the data based on principles which are different from the current standard in clinical research. The widespread communication and adoption of these design and analytical techniques is of high importance for the improvement of clinical research based on observational data.

Causal survival analysis under competing risks using longitudinal modified treatment policies (preprint)

Longitudinal modified treatment policies (LMTP) have been recently developed as a novel method to define and estimate causal parameters that depend on the natural value of treatment. LMTPs represent an important advancement in causal inference for longitudinal studies as they allow the non-parametric definition and estimation of the joint effect of multiple categorical, numerical, or continuous exposures measured at several time points. We extend the LMTP methodology to problems in which the outcome is a time-to-event variable subject to right-censoring and competing risks. We present identification results and non-parametric locally efficient estimators that use flexible data-adaptive regression techniques to alleviate model misspecification bias, while retaining important asymptotic properties such as $\sqrt{n}$-consistency. We present an application to the estimation of the effect of the time-to-intubation on acute kidney injury amongst COVID-19 hospitalized patients, where death by other causes is taken to be the competing event.

Integrative Metabolomic and Proteomic Signatures Define Clinical Outcomes in Severe COVID-19 (preprint)

The novel coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has ravaged global healthcare with previously unseen levels of morbidity and mortality. To date, methods to predict the clinical course, which ranges from the asymptomatic carrier to the critically ill patient in devastating multi-system organ failure, have yet to be identified. In this study, we performed large-scale integrative multi-omics analyses of serum obtained from COVID-19 patients with the goal of uncovering novel pathogenic complexities of this disease and identifying molecular signatures that predict clinical outcomes. We assembled a novel network of protein-metabolite interactions in COVID-19 patients through targeted metabolomic and proteomic profiling of serum samples in 330 COVID-19 patients compared to 97 non-COVID, hospitalized controls. Our network identified distinct protein-metabolite cross talk related to immune modulation, energy and nucleotide metabolism, vascular homeostasis, and collagen catabolism. Additionally, our data linked multiple proteins and metabolites to clinical indices associated with long-term mortality and morbidity, such as acute kidney injury. Finally, we developed a novel composite outcome measure for COVID-19 disease severity and created a clinical prediction model based on the metabolomics data. The model predicts severe disease with a concordance index of around 0.69, and furthermore shows high predictive power of 0.83-0.93 in two previously published, independent datasets.

Cytokine Signatures of End Organ Injury in COVID-19 (preprint)

Increasing evidence has shown that Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) severity is driven by a dysregulated immunologic response. We aimed to assess the differences in inflammatory cytokines in COVID-19 patients compared to contemporaneously hospitalized controls and then analyze the relationship between these cytokines and the development of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) and mortality. In this cohort study of hospitalized patients, done between March third, 2020 and April first, 2020 at a quaternary referral center in New York City we included adult hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and negative controls. Serum specimens were obtained on the first, second, and third hospital day and cytokines were measured by Luminex. Autopsies of nine cohort patients were examined. We identified 90 COVID-19 patients and 51 controls. Analysis of 48 inflammatory cytokines revealed upregulation of macrophage induced chemokines, T-cell related interleukines and stromal cell producing cytokines in COVID-19 patients compared to the controls. Moreover, distinctive cytokine signatures predicted the development of ARDS, AKI and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Specifically, macrophage-associated cytokines predicted ARDS , T cell immunity related cytokines predicted AKI and mortality was  was associated with cytokines of activated immune pathways, of which IL-13 was universally correlated with ARDS, AKI and mortality. Histopathological examination of the autopsies showed diffuse alveolar damage with significant mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltration. Additionally, the kidneys demonstrated glomerular sclerosis, tubulointerstitial lymphocyte infiltration and cortical and medullary atrophy. These patterns of cytokine expression offer insight into the pathogenesis of COVID-19 disease, its severity, and subsequent lung and kidney injury suggesting more targeted treatment strategies.